Holding the Man: 20 years on
By: Nathan Smith
Advertisement
Advertisement
There are many books we queers hold sacred.
For many of us they are mementos of our troubled and tormented adolescence. These might include Gore Vidal’s The City and the Pillar (1948) or James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room (1956).
While these books reflected my own angst-ridden, introspective teen years, they only seemed to offer antiquated portraits of homosexuality, as their social and political landscape had long since passed. Of their many meanings and stories, I could only really appreciate their portrayal of closeted gay men. Like me, these men struggled to reconcile their public heterosexual image with that of their private lustful desires.
I was 17 when a friend suggested I read Holding the Man, written in 1995 by Timothy Conigrave. I had seen the title, probably from Googling ‘gay novels’ on lonesome adolescent evenings. But this was a modern gay experience, and I was hesitant to read something so much closer to home. I wasn’t afforded the pleasure of time and distance; my own sexuality would now be so much more comparable to the portrait offered in this novel.
But in the words of Janis Ian’s iconic 1975 song of self-pity and angst, “At Seventeen”, one night I decided against inventing lovers on the phone and dipped back into literary waters, accompanied by Holding the Man.
What began as a hesitant curiosity of an Australian cult classic soon became an invigorating weekend read about two gay men rapturously in love. I devoured the book. The intimacy, devotion, and unbroken love of Conigrave’s star-crossed lovers really moved me.
Image from Belvoir St Theatre’s 2007 production of Holding the Man.
It is timely that I revisit Holding the Man this year, as February marked the 20thanniversary of the novel’s publication. A film adaptation is due out later this year, primed to be a faithful and accurate reworking of the novel. Much of the filming has taken place in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs.
The memoir is told through the eyes of the author Tim, a shy, young boy who develops an intense crush on John, the captain of the football team. Set in the 1970s, Tim and John begin a secret romance during their school years before entering adulthood united. As their romantic and sexual relationship matures, the pair must compete with the ravages of loneliness, homophobia, disease and ultimately death.
I have spoken to a number of friends and lovers about their experiences of reading Holding the Man. Many of them had similar responses to me. The exploration of issues around monogamy and promiscuity, the temptations of lust and self-destructiveness, and the politics of HIV/AIDS all feature in their interpretations.
For me, a standout element was the unbreakable love between Tim and John. Both characters possess a mythical quality, as the story tells of the masculine and popular footballer (the personification of Australian manhood) falling for the quiet and creative old soul. In Australian gender politics, John is legitimised as the true Australian because of his athleticism, machismo, and popularity among his mates. Tim, by comparison, does not meet these normalised standards prescribed by Australian society. Instead he becomes the quiet critic to the way Australian masculinity is prized and policed through these normalised practices in expectations of manhood and sport.
Through a critical lens that looks at Australia’s approach to masculinity, sport and ‘blokiness’, Holding the Man provided readers with an antidote, inviting Australians to deconstruct the template of machismo itself.
But the mythical status of the book may also be owed to its publication. Given that Holding the Man was published after Conigrave died – and remains the only published novel of the writer; a number of his plays have been published posthumously – the book is now enshrined as an important artefact, depicting not only a moving gay love story, but also the HIV/AIDS crisis that ravaged the queer community.
What marked the book’s first publication was the suggestion that Tim wrote Holding the Man as a kind of apology to John. After 15 years together, Tim inflicted a great deal of pain on his lover and life partner John – some close to the pair have said that Tim made it his life mission to memorialise their torrid but magnificent relationship together in novel form. Holding the Man was of course the outcome.
Rereading the novel with this in mind, you can’t help but see that Tim paints himself quite negatively at times while John is seen as the quiet confidante and companion that endures many difficulties with John across the decades.
It is important to also comment on the stigma and shame that surrounded HIV/AIDS at the time of the novel’s publication. Holding the Man counteracted this culture by offering an intimate and unashamed portrait of same-sex love and the pains wrought by the epidemic, demonstrating the ability of love to transcend and persist beyond death.
As the 20th anniversary has just passed on this seminal novel of Australia’s queer history, take a weekend to introduce, or re-familiarise, yourself with the power of Holding the Man. It will move you, as it has thousands of queer and straight readers alike since 1995.
Nathan Smith is a freelance writer and graduate student at the University of Melbourne. His writing has been published in Salon, The Advocate, and Huffington Post. Follow him on Twitter: @nathansmithr
This article was edited on 25 March 2015.
Damo? Mean comments? As in us being not so happy that the writer of this article, got way too many things wrong. You might see them as mean, others would see it as outrage towards the ill researched and written article by the writer. Thanks to the Online Editor (Joshua Allen) for responding to and fixing these mistakes. If you think an article with incorrect information is a “great article” you are part of the problem.
Goodness me. What mean comments. Great article and a favourite book.
While Holding the Man: 20 years on is an interesting read, there are a number of factual errors presented in this piece. Holding the Man, while completed before Conigrave’s death, the book wasn’t published until after his death. At least 2 of Conigrave’s plays (Thieving Boy & Like Stars in his Hands) have been published. Playbox Theatre Company presented these 2 works in 1997 at the Malthouse Theatre. They subsequently remounted in 1998 for the Midsumma Festival (Malthouse Theatre) and Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras (Wharf 2 Theatre). Currency Press published the script as part of the production program.
The author states ” As there was little understanding about HIV/AIDS, there was almost no widespread understanding of how those affected by its destructive hand cope.” is naïve, failing to recognise the excellent work that the Victorian AIDS Council (formed 1983) and ACON (Incorporated 1985) in these early years. Programs developed during these early years (and continue to be developed) in terms of outreach, research and support gained widespread recognition. In point, ACON has produced an excellent account of those early years to recognise their 25th anniversary in 2010 – readily available on their website.
Hi Rohan, thank you so much for engaging with us and contacting us about your concerns with this piece. I’m the Online Editor for Archer, and as we are a tiny team we unfortunately overlooked these inaccuracies. I’ve consulted with the writer and corrected the issues you have raised with the piece. I hope you continue to read what we publish, as we rely upon the community to call out any issues or potential mistakes we have created. Thank you for your time.
WOW this “article” is so incorrect! For starters HTM was published AFTER he died. Just goes to show if your published in Salon, The Advocate, and Huffington Post, doesn’t mean your any good! A shocker. I hope you haven’t paid him yet!
Hi Mark, thank you so much for your comment. I’m the Online Editor for Archer, and we have consulted with the writer to correct the inaccuracies within this piece. We greatly appreciate you contacting us, we rely upon the community to help us address any issues or potential mistakes we have made. Thank you for your time.
There are a number of factual errors in this story, which you may like to correct. For instance, the book was published after Conigrave’s death, and he published a number of plays in addition to the book.
Hi Deborah, thanks for your comment. I’m the Online Editor for Archer and I’ve consulted with the writer to correct the inaccuracies within this piece. Thank you so much for reaching out to us.
Sorry, but even some basic research by the author or sub-editor would reveal that HOLDING THE MAN was published after Tim’s death, not ‘before Conigrave died’ as the author of this piece claims. Nor is the book ‘the only published work of the writer’ – two of his plays were also published psthumously. I enjoy reading Archer’s thoughtful articles, but my enjoyment is severely curtailed by such obvious errors.
Hi Richard, I’ve contacted you directly – thank you so much for your comment and voicing your concerns. I’ve consulted with the writer and have corrected the inaccuracies you’ve mentioned.